Background
Triumph, together with MG and Austin Healey, made sporting British roadsters famous all over the world in the 1950s and 60s. Triumph’s TR family was the longest-lived of them all, beginning with the four-cylinder TR2 in 1953, growing in popularity through the TR3, 3A, 4, 4A (the first with independent rear suspension) and then the six-cylinder TR5 and TR6, before reverting to four cylinders for the TR7 - and eight for the rare TR8 - that took us right up to 1981.
So where does the TR250 fit in? It’s the North American market’s version of the TR5. Like the TR5, it uses the TR4A body shell with a 2.5-litre six-cylinder engine. Unlike the TR5, the engine is fed with a pair of Stromberg carburettors rather than Lucas PI mechanical fuel injection.
The reasons for this were said to be down to both cost and emissions. Triumph had to keep the price as low as possible in America’s ultra-competitive market and it was feared that the Lucas PI system would be harder to tweak for tight emissions standards than simple carburettors. You have to wonder if there was a third reason: did Triumph’s bosses foresee angry Americans in hot and bothered PI-engined cars dumping them back at the service department?
That Lucas injection is lovely when it’s set up properly, but it’s easy to upset with variations in fuel quality, with amateur maintenance and with extremes of temperature. Ask any 1970s traffic cop who sat in a hot in Triumph 2.5PI police car, praying it would start when the call came over the radio…
The TR250 used to be seen as the TR5’s poor relation. Today, this is less of an issue to most buyers because the best TR5s are so expensive now (£50,000 is not unusual for a Condition 1 car with a really good history) and the 250 offers such a similar experience. That means that bargains are getting scarce.
In this case, however, we’ve found exactly that.







